Wikipedia is a good informational source for chemistry
Wednesday, March 1st, 2006The Royal Society of Chemistry, a European organization for advancing the chemical sciences, investigates the claim that Wikipedia ‘could become the main source of chemical information in 5�10 years’. The claim was made by a professional chemist who contributes to Wikipedia.
The article notes that:
This finding is supported by regular contributor Martin Walker, assistant professor of organic chemistry at the State University of New York at Potsdam, US. Many of the chemistry entries are now reasonably accurate, he said, but you have to know where to look.
According to Walker ‘there are around 10 PhD-qualified chemistry contributors, as well as several knowledgeable graduate and undergraduate chemists’ that contribute to chemistry articles on Wikipedia.
If a free service were to become an often cited and reliable source of chemistry information it would be positive, because costly reference print materials and online databases can strain school and library budgets, or may even be beyond their reach. Cost is a barrier to information. Students attending schools that can’t afford to update their expensive reference collection every year are at a disadvantage. Wikipedia is becoming an avenue to information access that transcends economic boundaries. It may someday even the playing field, and I hope it does. I wish that more chemistry professionals, and experts in other fields, see the promise for equitable education in Wikipedia and contribute.
Found [Via]